Posts Tagged ‘design’

Article posté par Jay Vidyarthi
16/07/2008

Audio interface design as influenced by perception research

Image de Jay Vidyarthi Jay Vidyarthi - Comments 1 Commentaire

Research in “auditory psychophysics” represents the deep-level study of how the physics of sound is represented by our conscious mind. So what does that have to do with interface design? Well… anything that connects to human perception has implications on how we might perceive an interface. Taking the next logical step, modern research on sound perception can, and does, have implications for the next generation of audio interfaces (true for both a complete audio interface such as an automated phone system, or simply the audio aspect of a multi-modal interface such as a cell-phone ring). Examples of this trend can be seen surrounding interface ideas related to hearing loss.

First, let’s target the implications of research and technology geared toward accessibility for those suffering from hearing loss. Hearing aids have participated in an endless struggle with the telephone since their inception. Imagine your phone conversations continually interrupted by the amplified sound of your hearing aid bumping against your telephone. This is only one of many accessibility problems for hearing aid users. This problem multiplies in severity when compounded with the inability of microphones to distinguish relevant sounds from background noise (a factor which has expanded with the advent of using cell-phones in public places). So who has the answer? Nokia does, with their Wireless Loopset. This exceptional device is sure to be the first of a series of accessible solutions. The Loopset uses BlueTooth technology to actually turn your hearing-aid into your cell-phone headset, an elegant and complete solution.

Another demonstration concerns a condition known as presbycusis: a loss of sensitivity to high-frequency sound that emerges with age. In general, the older you get, the more difficulty you have hearing high-pitched noises. The condition emerges from the degeneration of certain neural receptors in the cochlea (a hydraulic pump within your ear designed to separate complex sounds into their individual components). The first “researchers” to jump on adopting interface implications from this were, in fact, young British students with mischievous intentions. It’s really quite brilliant; students configured their cell-phones to play an extremely high frequency ringtone (named ‘Mosquito’ in its original implementation by a Welsh security company). Ironically, this tone was first designed to disperse loitering teenagers while leaving adults unaffected. In this case, however, older professors could not detect the sound of their students text-messaging each other across the room. This anecdote raises two open questions:

  • How could we use this principle in a commercially viable device?
  • Are you young enough to hear the sound?
Article posté par Marcio Leibovitch
25/04/2008

When replacing obsolete icons…

Image de Marcio Leibovitch Marcio Leibovitch - Comments Ajouter un commentaire

One of the most sensitive subjects in a product revision project is the management of reactions to change, the transition between old and new.  How do we ensure that users, accustomed to using a product a certain way, will accept a new mode of interaction and forget the old?  The challenge is even more important when the product is used by the general public and we must change something that is already embedded in the collective unconsciousness, even if it’s arbitrary.

Desktop application icons are a perfect illustration of how hard it can be to minimize the obstacles of change.  In January 2008, Microsoft launched a new version of Office for Mac.  It was a totally new interface, modern and efficient… but something never seems to want to evolve, the diskette icon used to save files.  In fact, the Windows version also pays tribute to this prehistoric device.

Apple stopped including disk drives in 1998 (10 years ago) and Dell no longer produced machines with these devices since 2003 (5 years ago).  This means that the image of the floppy disk already means nothing to most 20 year-olds and younger.  Why is this icon still around?  

Anything that becomes a standard creates a natural barrier to change.  Those who have been using this function since it made sense always know what it means.  Those who can’t attach the image to any sort of hardware concept eventually learn to associate the image to the action, regardless of whether it makes sense or not.  What they remember is the final result associated with the icon.  

To get an idea of what I mean, look how odd it looks to see the disk replaced by another icon in the NeoOffice toolbar, the opensource version of Office for Mac:

(actually, this situation is even worse, as there isn’t even a label under the icon)

Technological evolution makes sure that all icons that refer to physical objects will become obsolete sooner or later (just think about the phone and microphone used in Skype, or the envelope used in several e-mail applications).  

But can we eventually change this?  When will we finally get rid of these obsolete icons?  Personally, I say never; maybe we have to wait until the actions themselves are no longer necessary and disappear, taking their icons with them.  What about you?  Do you have any other ideas?